For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, it-viking.ch with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, yidtravel.com given that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to broaden his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes should be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective but let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its best performing markets on the unclear guarantee of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is complete of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not sure for how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.